A planned Senate Banking Committee legislation markup has been postponed, as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has withdrawn his support for a market structure bill which seeks to codify federal regulations over crypto, stablecoins, and DeFi markets.
Based on reports, this unexpected withdrawal sharpened existing tensions between senators on debates of this bill and lawmakers who were trying to revamp critical phrases.
Republicans’ Concerns In Oversight
The Republicans in the Senate, under the leadership of Sen. Tim Scott, have strongly countered. They have expressed reservations about whether it is intended to help ordinary investors or just a few companies.
While some representatives expressed their concerns that broad oversight authority could stymie growth in addition to proposed net yields for stablecoins, reports have indicated that Republicans want more defined enforcement authority in opposition to broad regulatory language.
Crypto builders need clear rules of the road.
Over the past five years, Republicans, Democrats, and the Trump Administration have worked closely with members across the crypto industry to protect decentralization, support developers, and give entrepreneurs a fair shot.
At its…
— Chris Dixon (@cdixon) January 15, 2026
Bitcoin Unfazed By The Standoff
Despite the confusion, crypto prices remained firm. Bitcoin held its ground and climbed 1.5%. The top crypto asset retained its grip on the $96,000 level, while other top cryptocurrencies like Ethereum and USDT likewise notched similar gains in the last 24 hours, based on the latest market tracking figures.
Meanwhile, investors followed speeches and congress sessions. Market volatility heightened. Some investors opted to go to the sideline position as lobbyists and exchanges sought to shape the draft that will come next.
After reviewing the Senate Banking draft text over the last 48hrs, Coinbase unfortunately can’t support the bill as written.
There are too many issues, including:
– A defacto ban on tokenized equities
– DeFi prohibitions, giving the government unlimited access to your financial…— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) January 14, 2026
As a response to the new draft bill issued by the Senate, several industry representatives vocally objected to its provisions and expressed their belief that it could have a negative impact on tokenized equities and Decentralized Finance.
In fact, there are enough concerns in the blockchain sector raised by Armstrong, that he stated he would prefer to see no bill than see a bad bill passed, indicating that even some members of his industry agree with Republican concerns regarding possible overreach by Congress.
These industry groups said they will likely withdraw their support unless the Senate makes the necessary changes to allow for continued innovation and cross-border competition regarding blockchain technology.
Negotiations Continue To Take Place Behind Closed Doors
Some Senate leaders still want to move toward a committee vote, even though disagreement remains deep. Republican and Democratic legislators are currently negotiating or trading potential amendments on issues such as stablecoin legislation, DeFi protections and investor protections in an effort to reach an agreement on an acceptable version of the bill by both parties.
Democrats have identified a need to address regulatory issues regarding ethics, potential Money Laundering, and DeFi over-regulation as top priorities. On the other side of the aisle, the Republican Party continues to push for legislation that clearly defines the guardrails for federal regulators regarding blockchains.
As a result of ongoing negotiations, there is currently no set timeline for a Senate floor vote on the new legislation.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
