Ring isn’t having the week it probably thought it would have. The Amazon-owned company aired an ad on Super Bowl Sunday for “Search Party,” its new feature that turns a neighborhood’s collective Ring cameras into one network, with the goal of locating lost dogs. Viewers, however, saw this as a major privacy violation—it doesn’t take much to imagine using this type of surveillance tech to locate people, not pets.
The backlash wasn’t just isolated to the ad, however. The controversy reignited criticisms of the company’s partnership with Flock Safety, a security company that sells security cameras that track vehicles, notably for license plate recognition. But the partnership with Ring wasn’t about tracking vehicles: Instead, Flock Safety’s role was to make it easier for law enforcement agencies that use Flock Safety software to request Ring camera footage from users. Agencies could put in a request to an area where a crime supposedly took place, and Ring users would be notified about the request. They didn’t have to agree to share footage, however.
Law enforcement could already request footage from Ring users, through the platform’s existing “Community Requests” feature. But this partnership would let agencies make these requests directly through Flock Safety’s software. If a user submitted footage following a request, Ring said that data would be “securely packaged” by Flock Safety and share to the agency through FlockOS or Flock Nova.
Ring cancels its partnership with Flock Safety
That partnership is officially over. On Friday, Ring published a blog post announcing the end of its relationship with Flock Safety. The company said, after a review, the integration “would require significantly more time and resources than anticipated.” As such, both parties have agree to cancel the partnership.
What do you think so far?
Importantly, Ring says that since the integration never actually launched, no user footage was ever sent to Flock Safety—despite the company announcing the partnership four months ago. Social media influencers had spread the false claim that Flock Safety was seeding Ring footage directly to law enforcement agencies, such as ICE. While those claims are inaccurate, they were likely fueled by reporting from 404 Media that ICE has been able to access Flock Safety’s data in its investigations. Had Ring’s partnership with Flock Safety gone ahead, there would be legitimate cause to believe that agencies like ICE could tap into the footage Ring users had shared—even if those users were under the impression they were only sharing footage with local agencies to solve specific cases.
While privacy advocates will likely celebrate this news, the cancelled partnership has no effect on Community Requests. Law enforcement agencies will still be able to request footage from Ring users, and those users will still have a say in whether or not they send that footage. Ring sees the feature as an objective good, allowing users to voluntarily share footage that could help law enforcement solve important cases. In its announcement on Friday, Ring cited the December 2025 Brown University shooting, in which seven users shared 168 video clips with law enforcement. According to Ring, one of those videos assisted police in identifying the suspect’s car, which, in turn, solved the case.
